I like to imagine that as soon as we discover FTL and break spacetime, the simulation crashes and the higher beings are annoyed they have another bug to fix

I landed at the same "strict rules" conclusion back in 2007 when designing a sci-fi setting with FTL. I borrowed a bit from Douglas Adams and ended up with a version similar to one you hinted at. That any attempts to perform an action which would result in a paradox would be met with increasingly unlikely events to prevent it from occurring in the first place. Thus, before sending any FTL comms, or engaging in certain kinds of travel, you have to draw the light cones and think through the implications as shown in your video. Thanks for putting this together. It was nice to see someone think through the same things and tie it into a neat package.

Congratulations, you had my complete attention to the entire 25 minutes. Very well done video and explanation. Super interesting

One small thing: if the message is traveling in a different time perspective than the ship, in what time perspective will this ship be able to decode it? (a reference to Orson Scott Card's books about Ender). I think this is not considered in your diagram.

Cosmological and chronological paradoxes are so interesting, rather enjoyed listening to this more than I'd expected.

This is hands down one of the best channels ever! Love each and every video more than the last! Bravo and please keep doing what you do, it's voices like yours that truly touch peoples hearts and minds, revealing questions they never knew they were interested in knowing the answer to! If that makes sense, lol!

Does anyone realize how crazy it is that we can even theorize something like this

I would posit that it is possible it's just all about frames of reference. You would not be able to affect anything in your personal referential past. You could observe it, but not change it. I think the diagram is off in using the frame of reference for the STL ship as the "speed" of their FTL message would be significantly "faster" than the message from Earth. The correction for this means that their message would NOT arrive prior to that of the sent message. (On the graph their message would appear to them (could they see the graph) to curve upward past the message point. Using star trek terms if you fired off a message at warp 1 its not going to travel at (warp 1 + full impulse) simply because you were going at full impulse. Basically this graph "forgets" that for all of the pink FTL lines, the straight "space" line is not straight. For them it is a curve, so if you factor that in and the flatten it back out it shouldn't violate causality. I am probably wrong somewhere, it's 2 in the morning...

your level of explanation, and competence is amazing. You show great quality passion, high enthusiastic and love for astrology.

First thing that causality/FTL paradox diagram makes me think is that our basic understanding of causality may be inaccurate. That's the first place my brain reaches for. It's like running through an equation that you already know the answer to but coming up with the wrong answer. You know the answer you got is wrong because you know what the answer already is, you're just working through the scenario the equation presents. In life, when it comes to problems involving perception of any kind, I've learned that the first place you always want to look is at the human error factor. I'm no quantum physicist or math wizard, sure. But when you know the answer you're coming up with doesn't match the answer you know to expect, do you blame the problem or do you double check your work? Or to simplify it, when you take a measurement and then cut something to length and it doesn't work, do you check the measurement or do you check the cut length? Problem then becomes that we don't have a cheatsheet to refer back to and there's no way to run a real world version of it to see how we get to the answer. At least not yet.

So if I had a house on mars with a FTL facetime phone and was calling my friend on earth, I could communicate instantly as if we were face to face. But what if while we were FTL facetiming, we also had STL camera feeds of each other’s respective rooms? Could we then see each other in a present past and an instant present?

Amazing video! I really enjoyed it and it had addressed alot of questions that were unanswered and persisted on my mind regarding systems FTL

"It almost seems like a cruel cosmic joke that the universe be arranged such a way that we are able to look out and glimpse its wonders and yet are trapped here by the speed of light." So well said

Very interesting video! However, a question popped up for me about the breaking of the causality rule and I can't seem to answer it myself. So, according to the rule, "the world line defines the time axis, as perceived by those following it", and thus the time slice of the STL's crew has to be parallel to the that of the observer's (that is, them; the red dash line). However, I noticed that, according to the diagram, the hypothetical STL ship takes off from Earth (I assume the point of origin within the vertical Earth's time axis is the point of departure of the ship) to send the warning of the Supernova X to Vega before the Earth(lings) actually "sees" Supernova X. Does that mean that, in this case, it is implied that "seeing" is a different event than "perceiving", and that the Earth(lings) are aware of the Supernova X radiation coming their way before they actually "see" or rather experiment its effects (if any)? Also, assuming an STL ship was ready to be launched the moment something like Supernova X was detected (not "seen" as in the diagram; something prior to that), does that mean that both an STL ship and an FTL ship are sent to Vega within the same space and relatively the same time, just in different points in time on Earth relative to the "seeing" and "perceiving" of Supernova X? Should that be the case, then both ships would have been sent to space with the same knowledge of Supernova X and the same goal, and thus when the STL ship gets to Vega, it already knows about Supernova X happening right from its departure from Earth because its purpose was to warn Vegans about that in the first place, right? My point here is, the time slice for the STL's crew is supposed to be parallel to the red dash line, and as shown in the video causality was broken when applied, but the red dash line doesn't seem to start at the right point of the Earth's time axis if anything I said makes sense, and so its origin should be the same as the one from the FTL ship if "seeing" is the same as "perceiving", which is what I understand is the case. Then the testing with the time slice would make sense since the red dash line, with its new point of origin being the star on Earth in the diagram, would roughly have the same angle as the original green line that connects Supernova X, Earth and Vega, and thus the causality would be the same as with the FTL ship, the only difference being that the STL ship would get there long after Vegans noticed the Supernova X, right? Furthermore, the red dash line, from what I understand, does not represent the actual moment when the STL ship reaches Vega: it represents how its crew perceived the time that passed from their departure from Earth until their arrival on Vega, but the real moment when they reach Vega is the red line, not the dashed one. So, the only "paradox" here would be that the crew thought they reached Vega on time to warn Vegans about Supernova X when, in reality, it happened decades or centuries ago. Shouldn't we then apply the time slice in the the red line's angle and not in the dashed one? Otherwise, if an STL ship was sent to Vega before Supernova X was detected from Earth, then the diagram would be correct as it is but the causality wouldn't be broken: the STL ship would've been sent to Vega for a different purpose other than warn Vegans about Supernova X given that the crew from that STL's ship would not know about it: it just hadn't happened yet when they departed from Earth. In that case, just like in the last scenario, the only problem would be the crew's perception of reality or knowledge about it, but not the actual events that happened around them.

Hello Sir! Time Paradox you explained resides in a slice of space and time as concluded by Eienstine. How do we validate this Paradox in reference to continuous expansion of time and space without the measure of acceleration rate?

This video is an exceptional exploration of the possibility of faster-than-light (FTL) travel and messaging. The research referenced in this video is outstanding, and the music and film/TV clips used make it more interesting. The video is well researched and presented in an engaging manner. If you're interested in space travel and its possibilities, this is a must-watch! Subscribe to their channel to stay updated with their research.

My issue with this is the STL operates under the assumption that the crew or even a computer is capable of responding the exact same moment the message is received. Even if it was a computer setup to receive a 1 and return a 0 there's still time there for the response to be formulated and sent out

I so want to work with you and get a PhD. Unfortunately, I am neither a physics major nor good at physics!! But I absolutely love astronomy and everything you do on this channel.

There once was a young lad named Mike. Who could run faster than the speed of light. He took off one day, In a relative way, And returned on the previous night!

Great presentation. I always thought FTL so far eludes us was because of the infinite energy requirements. Since it's about causality, FTL does not seem possible

Excellent video! One question open for me is "How would the space axis look like for any FTL voyager? Would you flip it also relatively to the light speed? In that case in our frame of reference we would see their axes as inverted (meaning that they are travelling back in time?). Would a FTL traveller still see light moving always at light speed?

I think there's definitely a huge risk of putting something in the space of being 2 sizes at one time.

My explanation of time paradoxes has always been that the timeline is rewritten each time. For example in Terminator, John Connor rose to be a lead through other means. After the events of the movie happen, he becomes a better leader in the future and changes appearance (genes) due to his father being different than the previous timeline.

"The cosmic speed limit, the speed of light is so diminutive compared to a galaxy. It almost seems like a cruel cosmic joke that the universe be arranged in such a way that we are able to look out and glimpse its wonders and yet are trapped here by the speed of light. Fated to only ever peer through the bars of our cosmic prison and dream." -- This is so beautifully spoken...

"The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human ambition." -Carl Sagan

There are two possibilities. FTL is only possible between two locations that are not moving relative to each other, in which case they share the same “now”, or ftl is actually moving through the multiverse.

If you look at FTL as a linear speed then you probably have access to instant teleportation anyway, I feel as though acceleration and deceleration of anything traveling FTL would help alleviate a lot of confusion around space/time paradoxes. You would be looking at a lot more problems to solve with linear FTL such as matter being instantly obliterated as it instantaneously goes FTL. I like to imagine it as a function curve which starts out as STL then crosses the null line horizontally then decelerates to the same linear function of STL but below the null line. kind of like a tilda ~ I know all this is completely incorrect but hey might give someone something to think about or explain how wrong exactly i am :)

Fascinating stuff. My brain feels like it wants to expand beyond the confines of my skull. I think once we understand the true nature of the universe we will better understand the possibilities and consequences of FTL.

Thank you for breaking my brain. I have always had a problem with relativity, but I am not an academic in such things, I'm a layman with little real understanding. This both helped me understand and broke my understanding...

I'm just curious, if time is constantly moving forward as in the perspective of earth wouldn't the message be returned from the ship later in time? any clarification would be appreciated

The speed of light should really be taught as the speed of causality. The speed of light is an incidental stenographer of the speed of causality.

Just wanted to put this comment and anecdotal information into the universe. Your thumbnail image for this video, I've seen a close example of it in real life. Gravitational lensing / distortions surrounding an object with blueshift at front with redshift on rear, if I would've blinked at that moment I would have missed it. That was the most mind blowing night I've ever had, while stargazing deep in the mountains (other people were with me to confirm it wasn't a dream, there was a few more physics defying events that happened that night). I wish I was better at math to dive deeper into the topic, but there's only so much time in a week (ba dum tiss). Love the video, great detailed explanations!

I can’t do 73+29 in my head without panicking but these grand math problems fascinate me

I think there is a problem with the way the diagrams were drawn. The place it starts to break down (may actually be sooner but...) when the STL ship receives the message and then sends one back. It can most be seen when the message is sent instantly. The assumption is that the return message is actually received before the first message is sent. I have a problem with this. If there is a doorway where we can only view, not travel. You are on one end and I am on the other. You hold up a sign with a message. I see your message and I hold up my sign with my message. The two messages are sent instantly so the only time lag would be writing the return message. This means that the arrows that were drawn (specifically the second) are not drawn with the correct angle. Instead of the second being drawn further downward it should have been drawn upwards. I hope my description makes sense.

This is the one video that finally makes me understand paradoxes

Loved your video. Have your same feelings and hopes about it. But "Alcubierre" is a Spanish lastname. From one of our regions, the Basque Country. It's pronounced something like this "Al (like Al Copone), cu (like quality), bi (like bee), e (like elegance) and rre (like recognition). He is mexican with Spanish origins. Thank you and good luck ;)

In the Halo extended lore (books and etc), their use of slipspace creates time paradoxes like, constantly. It's not uncommon for a ship to arrive at it's destination hours, days, or WEEKS before it left. And everyone's collective reaction to the existence of these paradoxes is just to kinda shrug, say "hey man, don't worry about it too much," and move on

very well explained . thanks for sharing knowledge

The key to this explanation of FTL travel and time paradoxes seems to be the idea that a person's space axis is always a reflection of it's time axis about the null line. That is why when the STL ship travels close to the null line that it's space axis is also moved close to the null line. It isn't clear to me from this video why that is. But perhaps that is a larger and more complicated discussion.

It was all very nice explained and I understood almost all of it. there is only one thing I am trying to figure out. in the Diagram, why is the Space axis for the STL ship at an acute angle? wouldn't that mean that, even though they are traveling STL for us, it seems for them as though they are traveling faster than light? because, for them they are closer to the space axis than the time axis. I hope my question is understandable.

This video perfectly answered all the question I had on the subject, thank you!

I love your conclusion. Its true. I think the only real way to travel in space vast distances, would be in huge colony ships embarking everything it needs to last generations until it arrives on the next planet. It would need so much abnegation. a loing term view big objectifs.

Yet again you combine scientific explanation with a thoughtful and beautiful message. Thanks for one day deciding to start doing these videos, they mean a lot to me.

absolutely mind blowing video. loved it

It's been too long since I learned how reflecting lines about different axis' works; how does the ftl comm reply at 18:10 result in that line, rather than its reflection about the time axis (since it's traveling the opposite direction in space, like described at 8:53), which would then not break causality since the comm will still be traveling higher up the time axis rather than back down?

Bascailly, what I got from this is that as long as you don't have an STL ship traveling a significant percentage of the speed of light and using an FTL transmitter, then the odds of a paradox are bascially zero. And if we had FTL technology we probably wouldn't be using STL ships that travel at a significant percentage of the speed of light anyway. So it's a problem, but not a huge problem.

I have traveled through a deep dark hole many many times and seem to find myself amazed everytime

Sounds like you have given up, I don't have the answer to FTL but I can tell you that we aren't looking at it from the lens we need too. Your null lines in the diagram sure did look a lot like an imaging scope for sound fields. It got me to ask how if it at it could be related, the answer I came up with is interesting if you'd like to reach out to me. Keep the quest alive friends!!

I like how Terry Pratchett said it better than the way Hawking did: Everything that happens, stays happened.

Correct me if I’m wrong but the paradoxes would only happen if your going FTL but if your going at 0.99 the speed of light you’d just experience what a person on plane sees to a greater extent in terms of time dilation

The easiest way through this scenario would be communication protocols like radio silence.

If our efforts at FTL create paradoxes, what happens since parts space/time are currently traveling several times faster than light relative to us?

Thinking about this more. I'm pretty sure the result is due to the "instantaneous" message not being instantaneous in all reference frames. In this diagram it's instantaneous in the sender's reference frame, but not in the recipient's. That might be the correct as far as special relativity goes. But then again, before special relativity everyone thought the speed of light was different in different reference frames and no one considered that it could be the same in all reference frames. What does the result look like if we assume faster than light messages are the same speed in all reference frames, just like we assume with light? I don't think this would break causality. Though it might break other things. I need to think about it more.

Logically, you could replace "light" with "sound" and "see" with "hear", and FTL with FTS etc. and by the exact same logic and graph, nothing can go faster than the speed of sound.

I'm having a lot of difficulty wrapping my head around some things here. For example, why is the space axis a mirror-flip across the null line of the world line? For the "stationary" earth I get that it would look like a mirror-flip, but why is it? Also, when the transmission is sent from the STL ship after receiving the earth transmission, why is the slope negative? I feel like having this side-by-side with a similar diagram for the STL ship's perspective (with its world line being vertical, and the others being angled) would help clear things up... Like, I get that there's some consideration here for time dilatation, but wouldn't that be bypassed too, as using something like the Alcubierre drive, the object is not actually moving FTL, just the space it resides in is, so it wouldn't suffer time dilatation... I'm just getting confused.

How small of a an object or particle would it take to damage an object going the speed of light

Well.. sometimes there's circumstances that create two or more different speeds of sound. So I wonder if there's circumstances that could create different speeds of light? I'm postulating if you could cause variable light speed then you could also have variable time. But now wait a minute. Time is more related to gravity. I'm going to have to think about it some more.

14:50 I really tried to understand and comprehend this, was fine all the way up to the dotted stl axis..and I struggled :( rewatched and still can't get it. 😔 Edit: I watched the rest and as Marty Mcfly once said, (almost) 'I guess I'm just not ready for this stuff yet' 😅 A fascinating and intriguing topic, however.

Does anyone question whether or not if light actually has speed?

Hello everyone , if one could exceed the speed of light causing a distortion in time to reverse itself. Would " effect equal cause " ? Thank you.

Omg this diagram finally explained why and how space and time are connected. Thank you so much. I always thought I understood this concept but I was just repeating info not fully grasping it.

Every point in the universe has a unique energy signature. If you can create a device that could detect it and another device that could create it then you would be able to phase out of one location and phase into the location you want to be at regardless of distance.

Perhaps every instance of paradox creates its own tumeline and universe.

I'm not able to understand why the STL ship's space line (dotted red line) is at a lower angle than the ship's time (solid red line). Not saying you're , I may have missed something and would love to understand this model. Edit: I see now why the model works like this, as it's explained that the space line is just a flipped time line over the 45° angle.

Man great word choice in the introduction, you play beautifully with words and caught my attention with this awesome introduction so much that i just had to write it in a comment, you have a new subscriber:)

imagine you are somewhere else in the universe. now imagine you wanted to travel here. there you go. just saved a hell of a lot of time energy and effort.

What is most beautiful about this video - is actually what it has done to the comments section. Look at all the wonder, the questions, the curiosity, the debate. All these wonderful human beings trying to discover - this is what I love most about humanity, we're all in this thing together :)

Or, change your calendar as we know it into a light year calendar. Like for instance, time how long it takes to travel a light year in the same minutes and seconds use everyday, then adjust our calendar reflect those light days. Just a thought

If the idea is to work together for something beyond that is attainable by our own mortal timeline, for the benefit of the next generation or of the survival of humanity, then the ants and the bees have already beaten us to it. The movie Interstellar has given us this message in its final scenes.

you are great and i love your videos keep up your good work

Each second traveling the speed of light, you travel back in time 2,25 seconds. Made the calculation and formula sometime in 1997, being in highschool somewhere in Philadelphia. Could do the math again.

Can you travel slower? Is there any speed more slow than we know of and is it possible to travel that slow?

I always love the very grounding and philosophical thoughts proposed in these videos along with the theory. Really helps to place the science and the importance of these studies in a broader sense and why or why not humanity should pursue them.

Is it possible that FTL travel is possible but going backwards in time is just not an option? Essentially accelerating infinitely into the future but still having to wait for everything to catch up?

Interstellar is a great movie and it actually got me wanting to go to space, im 15 so i have my whole life ahead of me and i can't wait to see if i am actually able to accomplish my dream

Very interesting and very nice video. Many thanks.

So if Vega can get a warning can get a warning THEN later will see it, that means theoretically as soon as you get the warning you can travel at FTL to prevent it from happening thus going back in time

Wouldn't we also be blind while moving FTL since no photons can hit our eyes?

I’m in favor of the conclusion that if we encounter “paradoxes” in a scientific thought process we should consider that the concept is flawed. However, I would point out that the chart has problems when using the STL craft and it’s time slice. Even if one buys that the STL time slice is the correct angle here, it still matters where the craft is on that slice. The crew doesn’t get to instantly “know” when Vega sees things. You’d have to allow time for Vega to send the signal to the craft and by then the light from the super nova might have already reached the ship. In addition, the ship’s movement through space over the course of the events it does perceive would affect the value of this visual.

So since most of this is theory and assumptions I will question how this STL ship is capable of picking up non direct signals and messages at the speed of light (I imagine that FTL messaging would be more of a P2P affair than standard signals). Because while yes *technically* effect happens after cause but only if they receive this information at or faster than the speed of light. Which means that from the perspective of the crew, yes its a paradox, but its the same as if I got an email telling me about an oil spill and then got a newspaper that told me about how an oil tanker lost control and may or may not miss an island. In theory I could perceive this as a paradox if I chose to believe the newspaper to be more up to date than the email.

Honestly, the most depressing thing to think about is that if there is a form of FTL travel developed in the future, literally none of us will be alive to see it.

Consider this. If we use the warp drive, the answer to this seeming paradox lies in the means used for faster than light travel. You see, the ship itself is not actually moving fast than light. Space is moving around the ship faster than light. It is shrinking the space between in order to move between Earth and Vega. If you correct your graph to account for the warping of space, I think that you will find that it puts the procession of events into the correct order.

This is neat and informative, but it is unclear to me as to why the ship’s FTL world-line moves backwards in time…

Imagine being the first person to reach another star only to find humans have already colonized it because of time dilation

I like how he predicted every point where I got confused or skeptical and delivered a good answer without me ever asking anything lol About the talk in the end about exploration without FTL, it was quite poetic, but individuals can actually experience it one day and travel to many stars, considering there is no barrier in the laws of physics that say living things can't last for billions of years. More than that, the way in which time is perceived can be drastically modified, where a million years travel can feel like a mere hour. Just imagining human-like consciousness in a digital substrate is enough to see how this things are possible

It seems to me like the "protagonist" of causality is the one with agency. It would seem more intuitive, if the realities that the STL ship intercepts FTL message and sends a reply, and that Earth receives the reply before sending the message exist simultaneously. Of course, this could have some kind of crisis "prophecy" applications, wherein you just have to assume that unsolicited messages have a context that exists from the STL ship's perspective, but are absent in your own. It might be a good way to undo or mitigate cosmic catastrophes, to surround your solar system with detection satellites equipped with FTL relays. You would just be in your office and you would receive a message saying "Don't tell anyone about the supernova about to happen." They would later land and rendezvous and report that you had previously send a message stating that a supernova happened, do they sent one back in time to tell you not to bother. In a way the STL ship would be its own pocket of causality, unrelated to the wider universe. To suppose this somehow breaks the universe would suppose any form of clairvoyance also does so. I'm aware the latter is fantasy, but that's also what's said of sufficiently advanced technology.

How fast is the speed of sight? Would that be nice if we can look at a star and be there.

If we're "trapped" by the speed of light, I would imagine that it's for our own good.

i'm wondering how photons are experiencing space and time, since they are travelling at the speed of light there fore there space and time axis are the same. the more impressive fact for me that i can see in this diagram is that if you moving away from the object you are literally travelling backwards in time for that object

I think the thing is that people assosiate time with the speed of light. Seeing something has nothing to do with when it actually happens. Time still exists even if you are blind

Outstanding! FTL was always a dream since watching Star Trek as a kid. The fact that we can glimpse these wonders of the universe as water filled meat sacks is truly amazing. Even if it isn’t possible, I appreciate that logic as to why is isn’t possible. Space is big. We’re living in an age of high definition discovery.

If we couldn't sense light we would think that going faster than the speed of sound might cause paradoxes.

Wouldn't the problem be that your trying to use STL travel to warn a star about something traveling at the speed of light?

What do passengers of an ftl ship see when they reach the destination and the light that reflected off the point they started their ftp trip reaches them?

I have a question, I watched a KZonlines vid the other day and it mentioned in that one that galaxies are travelling away from us faster than the speed of light while the universe expands outwards. My question is why are we not travelling out at the same rate as them. It was mentioned some galaxy will pass the edge of the observable universe. Surely if we are moving away from what we believe is the centre we should be going at the same speed.

a bit confused on the wider implications of the time axis of the STL ship. It seems like you could launch another STL ship from Earth's STL ship, and now you have a ship that is FTL from earth's frame

I think as soon as something like FTL is achieved, we'll soon learn that there is some other, infinitely stranger arbitrary limitation way beyond our grasp that we could never have even conceived of before. I have dreams about it all the time, since I was a child in fact.

14:20 Is there a quick way to understand the angle of the STL ship's space axis? Or does it require a lot of time digging into theories and formulas?

Something people are struggling with is why the line is moving downward in the STL Ship example with the FTL transmission. It's understandable, given how unintuitive physics is with common sense. Im not 100% sure either whats exactly going on, but I think I can grasp enough to put it in laymans terms. So when the STL ship is moving through space, time around it is dialating according to how fast you move through space. The closer to the speed of light you are, the faster time seems to move around you as space literally speeds by. The problems begin when you reach the speed of light. What happens? Firstly, you are now past the speed of light. Think of a car. You know how when a car drives by you at the same speed, it almost looks like it's not moving at all, even if you know it is? That's what would happen to time and space around you as you perceive it. To light itself. Now consider what happens when you begin to outspeed light. It would move. But not forwards ahead of you. But behind you. Space and time would be so slow by your perspective that it would begin to move backwards, literally. The closer you get to another object, the further back in time that space will go. Atleast, in theory. There's definitely alot more to this, but don't feel bad if you can't figure it out. This is literally the science people spend their entire lives attempting to solve. Understanding the fundamental underworkings of our literal existence isnt something you just happen to have the ability to do. You are flesh and blood, and your instincts as well as common sense do not apply to the chaotic, esoteric universe that lets us live in it. In short, FTL might be fundamentally impossible because of physics, the theory of relativity, and paradoxs. To break a hardset rule might just not be physically possible, and we wont know for certain UNTIL we can figure out why Quantum Mechanics and Relativity don't mesh perfectly. Hope this helps, any physicists feel free to come and tell me if Im wrong somewhere. My understanding is very limited, so my word isnt law here.

They said the same thing about the speed of sound. However without a force shield to keep space junk from whipping you out. I meter at light speed would be deadly with out one.